Comments on: what you need to know

By: Olga

Olga — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:56:06 +0000

Huge congrats to Larissa! She totally deserves it. And see – I’m gullible, too!

PJ — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:25:52 +0000

:frazzled: I’m with Sasha – I missed something too.

And hey, I am shocked that you would say that Larissa was defiling your good name …:shocked:…it was more like…bruising your character. :biggrin:

~PJ~

Amy K. — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:37:28 +0000

Love this side of the story too!

Bonnie Ferguson — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:01:39 +0000

Oh that’s so great

Sasha — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:48:43 +0000

YAY Larissa….

Scandal..what scandal? I’m missing something aren’t I? :shocked:

cece — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:49:07 +0000

It couldn’t have happened to a more fab person

Eve — Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:47:50 +0000

His PREGNANT wife? :shoot:

Lynn Daniels — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:29:27 +0000

You guys crack me up. :LOL:

Larissa — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:41:19 +0000

Hmph. First of all, you’re only good at subtext because I taught you how to interpret all those Joss Whedon love emails. :thumbsup:

And second, I would NEVER send you fake-out emails! I’m hurt and shocked that you would accuse me of such a thing.

And third, thank you. I owe so many people, including Alison, a lot of thanks. But truly, you’ve been my rock, and I can’t thank you enough.

Can I stop being mushy now?

Tori Lennox — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:28:26 +0000

Btw, regarding The Scandal, he didn’t just leave his wife. He left his very PREGNANT wife!!!!

Tori Lennox — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:26:03 +0000

I never get subtext. At least I don’t think I do… Oh dear. Something new to worry about. :frazzled:

Eve — Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:22:42 +0000

Subtext huh?:smoke:

NO, really? Whoa .. I guess I’ll have to pay more attention Thursday and look for those “subtexts”